
EPYC 9374F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9374F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 82,268).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,201 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
EPYC 9374F
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,201 less on MSRP ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $4,850 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,009 vs 82,268).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($4,850 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX better than EPYC 9374F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 816 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 695 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 269 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 817 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1138 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 875 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 784 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9374F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9374F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9374F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 3.85 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9374F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9374F scores 82,009 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX's 82,268 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9374F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz | 4.2 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 82,009 | 82,268 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,294 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9374F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9374F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — the EPYC 9374F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9374F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9374F) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 2048 GB+34952433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9374F launched at $4850 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX debuted at $2649. On MSRP ($4850 vs $2649), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is $2201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9374F delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX the 59% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9374F | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4850 | $2649-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9 | 31.1+84% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












