PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,507 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,045 vs 55,000).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

2019

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,507 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,045 vs 55,000).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 16.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 149.5% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the better fit. You are getting 149.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 3990X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is 62.8% more expensive on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $3,990 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is also 63.3% better value on MSRP (20.0 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
1080p
low	181 FPS	188 FPS
medium	152 FPS	165 FPS
high	131 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	155 FPS
medium	125 FPS	131 FPS
high	102 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	70 FPS
medium	72 FPS	63 FPS
high	57 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
1080p
low	584 FPS	505 FPS
medium	503 FPS	448 FPS
high	386 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	491 FPS	419 FPS
medium	433 FPS	378 FPS
high	343 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	308 FPS	259 FPS
medium	275 FPS	236 FPS
high	235 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
1080p
low	681 FPS	910 FPS
medium	563 FPS	838 FPS
high	497 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	428 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	782 FPS
medium	488 FPS	716 FPS
high	427 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	528 FPS
medium	338 FPS	444 FPS
high	293 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	330 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
1080p
low	942 FPS	956 FPS
medium	842 FPS	865 FPS
high	724 FPS	748 FPS
ultra	639 FPS	649 FPS
1440p
low	777 FPS	790 FPS
medium	677 FPS	689 FPS
high	580 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	502 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	573 FPS
medium	489 FPS	513 FPS
high	429 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	392 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Open Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X scores 79,889 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 1,961, a 0% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,045 vs 55,000 (85.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+33%	48 / 96
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	79,889	79,683
Cinebench R23 Multi	64,366	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	22,045	55,000+149%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). PCIe lanes: 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	4	8+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+10%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 3990X	Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X launched at $3990 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($3990 vs $6497), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $2507 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 48.1% better value option.