
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6737P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,005 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,045 vs 45,000).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+104.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Xeon 6737P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 144 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,005 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $4,995 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+104.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 280W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,045 vs 45,000).
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6737P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (144 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($4,995 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6737P better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 584 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 491 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 883 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 677 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 756 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 942 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 842 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 724 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 777 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon 6737P


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P
The Xeon 6737P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 79,634 points. Launch price was $4,995.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6737P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6737P — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6737P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X scores 79,889 against the Xeon 6737P's 79,634 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,000, a 2% lead for the Xeon 6737P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,045 vs 45,000 (68.5% advantage for the Xeon 6737P). L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6737P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+78% | 144 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 79,889 | 79,634 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,366 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | 2,000+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,045 | 45,000+104% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6737P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6737P — the Xeon 6737P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6737P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs 8 (Xeon 6737P). Both provide 88 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) and C741 (Xeon 6737P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6737P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6737P). Primary use case: Xeon 6737P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon 6737P rivals EPYC 9005.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X launched at $3990 MSRP, while the Xeon 6737P debuted at $4995. On MSRP ($3990 vs $4995), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $1005 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6737P — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 22.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | Xeon 6737P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3990-20% | $4995 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0+26% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












