
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 98.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+611% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 62,323+194% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











