
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i5-13500H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13500H
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,080 vs 21,192).
Core 5 220H
2024Core i5-13500H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,080 vs 21,192).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Core i5-13500H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 370 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 431 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i5-13500H

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i5-13500H
Core i5-13500H
The Core i5-13500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,080 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core 5 220H and Core i5-13500H share an identical 12-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500H — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i5-13500H's 21,080 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 5 220H. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,080 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FCBGA1744 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500H). The Core i5-13500H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500H rivals Ryzen 7 7735HS.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i5-13500H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High performance laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












