
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,064 vs 21,192).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,064 vs 21,192).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 220H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,064 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE's 21,064 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 5 220H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+7% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,064 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











