Core 5 220H vs Core i9-10910

Intel

Core 5 220H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-10910

10 Cores20 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 5 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 5 220H

2024

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,396).
  • 1700% higher power demand at 45W vs 2.5W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10910 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-10910

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10910 better than Core 5 220H?
Yes. Core i9-10910 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10910 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10910 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-10910 is the smarter buy today. Core i9-10910 is at an unclear MSRP at $488 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (43.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 220H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
1080p
low277 FPS290 FPS
medium249 FPS254 FPS
high210 FPS214 FPS
ultra181 FPS183 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS242 FPS
medium186 FPS191 FPS
high152 FPS157 FPS
ultra134 FPS137 FPS
4K
low161 FPS168 FPS
medium131 FPS134 FPS
high101 FPS103 FPS
ultra88 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
1080p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium521 FPS535 FPS
high427 FPS449 FPS
ultra385 FPS405 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium449 FPS498 FPS
high376 FPS411 FPS
ultra323 FPS353 FPS
4K
low330 FPS350 FPS
medium279 FPS299 FPS
high256 FPS279 FPS
ultra225 FPS242 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
1080p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS535 FPS
high530 FPS535 FPS
ultra530 FPS535 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS535 FPS
high530 FPS535 FPS
ultra496 FPS493 FPS
4K
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium492 FPS497 FPS
high439 FPS442 FPS
ultra370 FPS369 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
1080p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS535 FPS
high530 FPS535 FPS
ultra530 FPS535 FPS
1440p
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS535 FPS
high530 FPS535 FPS
ultra530 FPS535 FPS
4K
low530 FPS535 FPS
medium530 FPS535 FPS
high500 FPS510 FPS
ultra431 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i9-10910

Intel

Core 5 220H

The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Intel

Core i9-10910

The Core i9-10910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 21,396 points. Launch price was $488.

Processing Power

The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10910 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core 5 220H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-10910 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10910 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10910 uses Comet Lake-S (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i9-10910's 21,396 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-10910. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 20 MB on the Core i9-10910.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
20 MB+11%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2.5 MB+25%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Comet Lake-S (2020)
PassMark
21,192
21,396
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10910 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10910). The Core i9-10910 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore 5 220HCore i9-10910
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d