
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i9-10910
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,396).
- ❌1700% higher power demand at 45W vs 2.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10910 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-10910
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i9-10910
2020Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,396).
- ❌1700% higher power demand at 45W vs 2.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10910 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10910 better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 369 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i9-10910

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i9-10910
Core i9-10910
The Core i9-10910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 21,396 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10910 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core 5 220H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-10910 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10910 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10910 uses Comet Lake-S (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i9-10910's 21,396 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-10910. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 20 MB on the Core i9-10910.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB+25% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Comet Lake-S (2020) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,396 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10910 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10910). The Core i9-10910 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i9-10910 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












