
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,195).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700T
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $339 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core 5 220H
2024Core i7-12700T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,195).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $339 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700T better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Core i7-12700T

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i7-12700T
Core i7-12700T
The Core i7-12700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,195 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i7-12700T's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12700T — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-12700T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Core i7-12700T's 21,195 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-12700T. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700T.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+93% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+39% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,195 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,568 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,256 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,560 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-12700T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700T). The Core i7-12700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Core i7-12700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












