
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,287).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core 5 220H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 21,287).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 220H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 527 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 381 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 220H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U's 21,287 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 21,287 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core 5 220H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











