
Ryzen 7 8745HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3900XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 8745HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 9 3900XT needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,400).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 3900XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8745HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8745HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8745HX.
Ryzen 7 8745HX
2025Ryzen 9 3900XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 9 3900XT needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900XT across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 18,400).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8745HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8745HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8745HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3900XT better than Ryzen 7 8745HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 816 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 735 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 653 FPS | 557 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 310 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 816 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 816 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 816 FPS | 813 FPS |
| ultra | 772 FPS | 756 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 816 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 578 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 432 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 3900XT


Ryzen 7 8745HX
Ryzen 7 8745HX
The Ryzen 7 8745HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,620 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ryzen 9 3900XT
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,512 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8745HX packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900XT offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 3900XT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8745HX versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900XT — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8745HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses Matisse 2 (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 32,620 against the Ryzen 9 3900XT's 32,512 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 8745HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 18,400 (2.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 1,750, a 42.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 8745HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 10,500 (25% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8745HX vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900XT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+9% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range (2025) | Matisse 2 (2020) |
| PassMark | 32,620 | 32,512 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | 18,400+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+54% | 1,750 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,500+29% | 10,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8745HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8745HX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900XT — the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 3900XT supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 8745HX) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) — the Ryzen 7 8745HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 7 8745HX) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900XT).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 8745HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8745HX targets High-end Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 9 3900XT targets Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8745HX rivals Core i7-14700HX; Ryzen 9 3900XT rivals Core i9-10900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming Laptop | Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












