PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 205W, a 170W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-3245M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌485.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 205W, a 170W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-3245M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 18,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌485.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Ryzen 7 7840HS?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3245M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the better fit. You are getting 9.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-3245M is at an unclear MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3245M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	267 FPS	185 FPS
medium	242 FPS	150 FPS
high	203 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	148 FPS
medium	193 FPS	117 FPS
high	157 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	163 FPS	82 FPS
medium	136 FPS	70 FPS
high	105 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	44 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon W-3245M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	495 FPS	531 FPS
medium	406 FPS	447 FPS
high	347 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	432 FPS	461 FPS
medium	374 FPS	399 FPS
high	320 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	287 FPS
medium	258 FPS	248 FPS
high	242 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	199 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon W-3245M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	713 FPS	712 FPS
medium	713 FPS	712 FPS
high	713 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	713 FPS	712 FPS
medium	646 FPS	712 FPS
high	545 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	544 FPS	524 FPS
medium	475 FPS	428 FPS
high	422 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon W-3245M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	713 FPS	712 FPS
medium	713 FPS	712 FPS
high	713 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	713 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	713 FPS	712 FPS
medium	713 FPS	712 FPS
high	658 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	646 FPS
medium	511 FPS	566 FPS
high	456 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon W-3245M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Xeon W-3245M

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 18,500 (9.3% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,474, a 28.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,572 (2.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+11%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22 MB+38%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	16 MB+1500%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	28,538	28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,854	18,500+10%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962+33%	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898+3%	11,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro