
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2191B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2191B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2191B
2017Why buy it
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 28,538).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Xeon W-2191B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2191B needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 28,538).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Xeon W-2191B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 713 FPS | 675 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 709 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 407 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Xeon W-2191B


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2191B
Xeon W-2191B
The Xeon W-2191B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,362 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2191B offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2191B has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2191B — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2191B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Xeon W-2191B's 28,362 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2191B.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+65% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+55% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 28,538 | 28,362 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2191B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2191B — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2191B supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 4 (Xeon W-2191B). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 48 (Xeon W-2191B) — the Xeon W-2191B offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 512 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2191B). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-2191B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Xeon W-2191B targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon W-2191B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












