PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Platinum 8160 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,538 vs 28,989).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Platinum 8160 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,538 vs 28,989).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Xeon Platinum 8160?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8160 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8160 is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 34.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8160 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low	267 FPS	195 FPS
medium	242 FPS	158 FPS
high	203 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	157 FPS
medium	193 FPS	123 FPS
high	157 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	163 FPS	72 FPS
medium	136 FPS	60 FPS
high	105 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon Platinum 8160

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low	495 FPS	212 FPS
medium	406 FPS	188 FPS
high	347 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	137 FPS
1440p
low	432 FPS	184 FPS
medium	374 FPS	167 FPS
high	320 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	120 FPS
medium	258 FPS	109 FPS
high	242 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	208 FPS	82 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon Platinum 8160

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low	713 FPS	725 FPS
medium	713 FPS	725 FPS
high	713 FPS	725 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	652 FPS
1440p
low	713 FPS	710 FPS
medium	646 FPS	610 FPS
high	545 FPS	576 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	508 FPS
4K
low	544 FPS	458 FPS
medium	475 FPS	360 FPS
high	422 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	260 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon Platinum 8160

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low	713 FPS	725 FPS
medium	713 FPS	725 FPS
high	713 FPS	670 FPS
ultra	713 FPS	583 FPS
1440p
low	713 FPS	679 FPS
medium	713 FPS	593 FPS
high	658 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	477 FPS
medium	511 FPS	427 FPS
high	456 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	330 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840HS Open Xeon Platinum 8160

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Xeon Platinum 8160

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+81%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	33 MB+106%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	28,538	28,989+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,854	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600	2666+53220%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+34952433%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC	—