PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 35W, a 15W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,854).

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 35W vs 20W.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 35W, a 15W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,854).

Trade-offs

❌75% higher power demand at 35W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Core Ultra 5 225H?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 16% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better fit. You are getting 16% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 5 225H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	299 FPS	267 FPS
medium	262 FPS	242 FPS
high	218 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	245 FPS	235 FPS
medium	193 FPS	193 FPS
high	157 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	163 FPS
medium	134 FPS	136 FPS
high	104 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	685 FPS	495 FPS
medium	543 FPS	406 FPS
high	432 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	432 FPS
medium	471 FPS	374 FPS
high	385 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	349 FPS	285 FPS
medium	293 FPS	258 FPS
high	267 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	208 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	720 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	653 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	646 FPS
high	624 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	537 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	628 FPS	544 FPS
medium	519 FPS	475 FPS
high	458 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	720 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	720 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	713 FPS
medium	720 FPS	713 FPS
high	677 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	579 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	604 FPS	574 FPS
medium	538 FPS	511 FPS
high	486 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 16,854 (14.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,962, a 30.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,898 (3.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 14+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB+13%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	28,802	28,538
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,526	16,854+16%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,678+36%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,337+4%	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	FCBGA2049	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	28+40%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 130T GPU	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	Professional Content Creation Laptop	High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC