
Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4510T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 115W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Xeon Silver 4510T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Silver 4510T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌475% higher power demand at 115W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Xeon Silver 4510T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 115W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Xeon Silver 4510T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+10.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌475% higher power demand at 115W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Xeon Silver 4510T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 682 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Xeon Silver 4510T

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Xeon Silver 4510T
Xeon Silver 4510T
The Xeon Silver 4510T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 29,119 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4510T — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Xeon Silver 4510T's 29,119 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4510T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 16,000 (9.7% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4510T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,800, a 39.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,000 (11.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4510T.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+32% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+115% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 30 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,802 | 29,119+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | 16,000+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+49% | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337+12% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon Silver 4510T supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4510T). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4510T) — the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4510T).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Silver 4510T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4510T). The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Xeon Silver 4510T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Xeon Silver 4510T targets Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Xeon Silver 4510T rivals EPYC 8124.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













