
Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:

Xeon w3-2525
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+33.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 175W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Xeon w3-2525 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,337 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2525, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w3-2525
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,678).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $609 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌775% higher power demand at 175W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Xeon w3-2525
2024Why buy it
- ✅+33.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 175W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Xeon w3-2525 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,337 vs 15,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2525, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,678).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $609 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌775% higher power demand at 175W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Xeon w3-2525?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 634 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Xeon w3-2525

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Xeon w3-2525
Xeon w3-2525
The Xeon w3-2525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,641 points. Launch price was $609.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon w3-2525 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2525 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Xeon w3-2525's 28,641 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 2,000, a 29% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 15,000 (19.5% advantage for the Xeon w3-2525). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2525.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+23% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 22.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,802 | 28,641 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+34% | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337 | 15,000+22% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 TB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2525). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2525) — the Xeon w3-2525 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and W790 (Xeon w3-2525).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2 TB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w3-2525 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Xeon w3-2525 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Xeon w3-2525 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Xeon w3-2525 rivals Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













