
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 2,332).
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+18.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,854).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+5.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 2,332).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,854).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Ryzen 7 7840HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 15,930 (5.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,332, a 17.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,037 (7.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 28,538 | 29,088+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854+6% | 15,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,332+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898+8% | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












