
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 2,174).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+10.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+10.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,962 vs 2,174).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,854 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen 7 7840HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 713 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 9 5900X


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 30.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 21,000 (21.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,174, a 10.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,888 (0.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 28,538 | 38,955+37% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854 | 21,000+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,174+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898 | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












