
Core 5 220H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 220H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 220H
2024Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,192 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core 5 220H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 220H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core 5 220H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 220H and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
The Core 5 220H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 21,192 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core 5 220H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 220H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core 5 220H versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 220H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 220H scores 21,192 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 26.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 220H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 32 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 21,192 | 27,712+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 220H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 220H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 220H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











