
Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2733NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,206 vs 16,305).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,206 vs 16,305).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 1800X better than Xeon D-2733NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 312 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon D-2733NT


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon D-2733NT
Xeon D-2733NT
The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 1800X and Xeon D-2733NT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1800X scores 16,305 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16384 kB+7% | 15 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+220% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,305 | 16,206 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,314 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 1800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X) / not specified (Xeon D-2733NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 1800X | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











