
Ryzen 5 7500F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6252
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 27,148).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6252, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 27,148).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6252, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7500F better than Xeon Gold 6252?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 657 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7500F and Xeon Gold 6252


Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.

Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252
The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7500F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7500F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 26,727 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+35% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB+2300% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,727 | 27,148+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












