
Ryzen 5 7500F
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2468
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2468, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,652 vs 26,727).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2468, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,652 vs 26,727).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7500F better than Xeon E-2468?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7500F and Xeon E-2468


Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.

Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7500F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2468 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2468 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 26,727 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7500F. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+42% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 26,727 | 26,652 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












