
Ryzen 5 7500F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7500F better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7500F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS


Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7500F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 26,727 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,727 | 26,852 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












