
Ryzen 5 7500F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Ryzen 5 7500F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7500F and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS


Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7500F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 26,727 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,727 | 26,864 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












