
Ryzen 5 7500F
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2699A v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,759).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,727 vs 26,759).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7500F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7500F moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7500F better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 668 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 521 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7500F and Xeon E5-2699A v4


Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
The Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,727 points. Launch price was $179.

Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4
The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7500F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7500F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7500F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 26,727 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7500F vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 22 / 44+267% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+39% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+54% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 55 MB (total)+72% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 26,727 | 26,759 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7500F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7500F | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












