
Ryzen 3 8300GE
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,671).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1250, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Xeon W-1250
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Xeon W-1250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $156 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 48.0 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $285 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,671).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1250, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.0 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($285 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Xeon W-1250?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 295 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300GE and Xeon W-1250


Ryzen 3 8300GE
Ryzen 3 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1250
Xeon W-1250
The Xeon W-1250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,671 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 8300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-1250 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-1250 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-1250 — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300GE is built on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 13,568 against the Xeon W-1250's 13,671 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-1250. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | — |
| PassMark | 13,568 | 13,671 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1250 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 8300GE launched at $129 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1250 debuted at $285. On MSRP ($129 vs $285), the Ryzen 3 8300GE is $156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 8300GE delivers 105.2 pts/$ vs 48.0 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1250 — making the Ryzen 3 8300GE the 74.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon W-1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-55% | $285 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.2+119% | 48.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












