Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Xeon E5-2658 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2658 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,487 vs 13,568).
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Xeon E5-2658 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2658 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2658 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,487 vs 13,568).
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Xeon E5-2658 V3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2658 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 8300GE is at an unclear MSRP at $129 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 3 8300GE Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2658 V3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon E5-2658 V3
1080p
low	262 FPS	160 FPS
medium	233 FPS	138 FPS
high	199 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	134 FPS
medium	185 FPS	113 FPS
high	153 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	62 FPS
medium	129 FPS	56 FPS
high	99 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon E5-2658 V3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon E5-2658 V3
1080p
low	339 FPS	193 FPS
medium	280 FPS	175 FPS
high	245 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	286 FPS	167 FPS
medium	238 FPS	153 FPS
high	214 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	212 FPS	109 FPS
medium	183 FPS	101 FPS
high	153 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	71 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon E5-2658 V3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon E5-2658 V3
1080p
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	337 FPS
high	339 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	337 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	337 FPS
high	339 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	316 FPS
high	339 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	293 FPS	232 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon E5-2658 V3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon E5-2658 V3
1080p
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	337 FPS
high	339 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	337 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	337 FPS
high	339 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	339 FPS	337 FPS
medium	339 FPS	337 FPS
high	339 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	324 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon E5-2658 V3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300GE and Xeon E5-2658 V3

Ryzen 3 8300GE

The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2658 V3

The Xeon E5-2658 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,487 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 8300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 V3 — a 51.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 13,568 against the Xeon E5-2658 V3's 13,487 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658 V3.

Feature	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon E5-2658 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+69%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256K (per core)
Process	4 nm-82%	22 nm
Architecture	Phoenix2 (2024)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	13,568	13,487

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.