
Ryzen 3 8300GE
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1587
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,523 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $1,652 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1174.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $1,652 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,630).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1587, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon D-1587
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($1,652 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1667 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Xeon D-1587
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,523 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $1,652 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1174.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $1,652 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,630).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1587, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($1,652 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1667 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Xeon D-1587?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 302 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300GE and Xeon D-1587


Ryzen 3 8300GE
Ryzen 3 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1587
Xeon D-1587
The Xeon D-1587 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,630 points. Launch price was $1,443.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 8300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1587 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-1587 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon D-1587 — a 72.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon D-1587 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 13,568 against the Xeon D-1587's 13,630 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-1587. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1587.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 32+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+113% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+106% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+433% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix2 (2024) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,568 | 13,630 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1587 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 8300GE launched at $129 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1587 debuted at $1652. On MSRP ($129 vs $1652), the Ryzen 3 8300GE is $1523 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 8300GE delivers 105.2 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1587 — making the Ryzen 3 8300GE the 170.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 8300GE | Xeon D-1587 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-92% | $1652 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.2+1167% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












