Ryzen 3 8300GE vs Xeon D-1823NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,673).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1823NT, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon D-1823NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1823NT

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Xeon D-1823NT

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,673).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1823NT, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon D-1823NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Xeon D-1823NT?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1823NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1823NT is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 8300GE is at an unclear MSRP at $129 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon D-1823NT is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 3 8300GE Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1823NT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon D-1823NT
1080p
low	262 FPS	179 FPS
medium	233 FPS	146 FPS
high	199 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	145 FPS
medium	185 FPS	115 FPS
high	153 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	69 FPS
medium	129 FPS	58 FPS
high	99 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon D-1823NT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon D-1823NT
1080p
low	339 FPS	191 FPS
medium	280 FPS	166 FPS
high	245 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	118 FPS
1440p
low	286 FPS	169 FPS
medium	238 FPS	147 FPS
high	214 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	212 FPS	147 FPS
medium	183 FPS	131 FPS
high	153 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	83 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon D-1823NT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon D-1823NT
1080p
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	342 FPS
high	339 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	342 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	342 FPS
high	339 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	332 FPS
4K
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	297 FPS
high	339 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	293 FPS	202 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon D-1823NT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon D-1823NT
1080p
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	342 FPS
high	339 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	342 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	342 FPS
high	339 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	339 FPS	342 FPS
medium	339 FPS	342 FPS
high	339 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	320 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 8300GE Open Xeon D-1823NT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 8300GE and Xeon D-1823NT

Ryzen 3 8300GE

The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1823NT

The Xeon D-1823NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,673 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 8300GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1823NT offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-1823NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1823NT — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 8300GE is built on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 13,568 against the Xeon D-1823NT's 13,673 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon D-1823NT. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE vs 10240 kB on the Xeon D-1823NT.

Feature	Ryzen 3 8300GE	Xeon D-1823NT
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+40%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10240 kB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm	—
Architecture	Phoenix2 (2024)	—
PassMark	13,568	13,673

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 8300GE uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1823NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.