
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 220W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+63.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 716.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 150W.
A10G
2021GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 220W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+63.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 716.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌401% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does A10G make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 3070

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 63.1%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 22,172+63% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+57% | 5888 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+55% | 20.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+57% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+55% | 5.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+57% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+57% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 37.8% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-32% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 100.8+11% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 80% less ($2001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 722.2% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $499-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 44.4+722% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #182 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













