
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅68.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅68.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 68%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119 | 16,995+68% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3584+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+319% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz | 1777 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 360 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-71% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+102% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $329 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | April 23 2020 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #324 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











