
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

L4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 72W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌44% higher power demand at 72W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 72W, a 22W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌44% higher power demand at 72W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is L4 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and L4

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the L4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 7424+625% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+896% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz | 2040 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 7.5 MB+650% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the L4 has 8 GB. The L4 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the L4's 72W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-31% | 72W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 169mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+44% | 141.0 |
Value Analysis
The L4 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2345 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | April 23 2020 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #324 | #259 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











