
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅22.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅22.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 10,119 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS+61% | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz+7% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 50W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6 | 202.4+60% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











