
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 33 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1035 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 5.299 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1035 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119 | 10,080 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS+74% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+43% | 1035 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+50% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+51% | 134.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











