
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌659.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 849.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
A10G
2021GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 849.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,598 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌659.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is A10G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 3060

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 25%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 288 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 16,995+25% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+157% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+147% | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1777 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 288+157% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+157% | 3.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+157% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+157% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The A10G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 12.5% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-12% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 100.0+10% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 86.8% less ($2171 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 857.4% better value.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $329-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 51.7+857% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #182 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













