
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega 56 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega 56: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega 56 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon RX Vega 56

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,026 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+2% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+2% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 28.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-25% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1+34% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #592 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













