
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌351.4% higher power demand at 158W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 158W, a 123W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 158W, a 123W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌351.4% higher power demand at 158W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,209 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+19% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2520 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+167% | 24 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+300% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.8 MB+105% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 127.5% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 35W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1 | 377.4+354% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













