Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 158W instead of 250W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌58.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 158W.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 158W instead of 250W, a 92W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌58.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 158W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 64X better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 13,130 vs 13,369 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 28 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro Vega 64X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,200 MSRP. Radeon Pro Vega 64X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro Vega 64X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,200 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (158W vs 250W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (158W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 64X. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 64X currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 64X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	211 FPS	108 FPS
medium	191 FPS	98 FPS
high	160 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	96 FPS
medium	158 FPS	82 FPS
high	115 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	48 FPS
medium	66 FPS	43 FPS
high	47 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	29 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	320 FPS	301 FPS
medium	269 FPS	262 FPS
high	212 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	212 FPS	204 FPS
medium	176 FPS	175 FPS
high	150 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	100 FPS
medium	81 FPS	84 FPS
high	68 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	56 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	591 FPS	526 FPS
medium	473 FPS	452 FPS
high	394 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	443 FPS	413 FPS
medium	355 FPS	347 FPS
high	295 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	222 FPS	226 FPS
4K
low	295 FPS	258 FPS
medium	236 FPS	214 FPS
high	197 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	135 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	321 FPS	258 FPS
medium	279 FPS	213 FPS
high	243 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	197 FPS
medium	212 FPS	162 FPS
high	185 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	118 FPS
medium	125 FPS	105 FPS
high	101 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	70 FPS

Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
G3D Mark Score	13,130	13,369+2%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2	4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	12.03 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz+2%	1468 MHz
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2	256+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VRAM Capacity	28 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCE 4.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 45.1% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
TDP	158W-37%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	83.1+55%	53.5