
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 250W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌58.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 158W.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 64: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 250W, a 92W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌58.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 158W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than Radeon Pro Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 348 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 145 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon Pro Vega 64

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130+2% | 12,891 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 11.06 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+11% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 45.1% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-37% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1+61% | 51.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #592 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













