
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 400W, a 242W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌153.2% higher power demand at 400W vs 158W.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 400W, a 242W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌153.2% higher power demand at 400W vs 158W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3840 ×2+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1967 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240 ×2+7% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 86.7% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-61% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1+152% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3499 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #592 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













