
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 158W, a 38W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 158W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6600X make more sense than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon PRO W6600X

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,113 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+6% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2479 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+75% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 27.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 120W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1 | 109.3+32% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #592 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













