
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 260W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 120W.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 260W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 49.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than Radeon RX 7900 GRE?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7900 GRE still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 438 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 735 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 661 FPS | 662 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 655 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,162 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 27,048 and the Radeon RX 7900 GRE reaches 27,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Raw compute: 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 80 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) with 304 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,048 | 27,162 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+90% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 32.98 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2245 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 112 | 160+43% |
| TMUs | 304 | 320+5% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+280% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+967% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 80+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+967% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 7900 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 260W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 276mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-54% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 276mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 225.4+116% | 104.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












