
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅7.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 304).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3090
2020GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅7.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (328 vs 304).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 328), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3090?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3090 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 765 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 534 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 296 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile reaches 27,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 328 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594 | 27,048+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+8% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS+8% | 32.98 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 112 | 112 |
| TMUs | 328+8% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 10.3 MB+8% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 64 MB+967% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+8% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+8% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 62.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+63% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 64 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 97.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 312mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 120W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 312mm | 0mm |
| Height | 140mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 225.4+197% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | AD103 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #37 | #30 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












