
GeForce RTX 3090
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌59.1% higher power demand at 350W vs 220W.
Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 350W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 3090
2020Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 17.7 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 350W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌59.1% higher power demand at 350W vs 220W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 better than Radeon RX 9070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 9070 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 957 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 798 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 898 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 718 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 569 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 904 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 841 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 733 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 707 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 286 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon RX 9070

GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
The GeForce RTX 3090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,594 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 26,594 and the Radeon RX 9070 reaches 25,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 9070 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,496 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070). Raw compute: 35.58 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 82 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 56 (Radeon RX 9070) with 328 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,594+5% | 25,380 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10496+193% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.58 TFLOPS | 36.13 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 2520 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 112 | 128+14% |
| TMUs | 328+46% | 224 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82+46% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 328+193% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3090 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3090 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 936 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) — a 46.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) — the Radeon RX 9070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 936 GB/s+46% | 640 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3090) vs Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3090 draws 350W versus the Radeon RX 9070's 220W — a 45.6% difference. The Radeon RX 9070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 312mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 220W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 312mm | 267mm |
| Height | 140mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 115.4+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3090 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549. The Radeon RX 9070 costs 63.4% less ($950 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.7 (GeForce RTX 3090) vs 46.2 (Radeon RX 9070) — the Radeon RX 9070 offers 161% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3090 | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $549-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 46.2+161% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 48 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #37 | #39 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












