G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 295W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌145.8% higher power demand at 295W vs 120W.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 295W, a 175W reduction.

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌145.8% higher power demand at 295W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon PRO W7900 averages 6.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 27,048 vs 28,211 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon PRO W7900 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7900 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $3,999 MSRP. Radeon PRO W7900 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon PRO W7900 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $3,999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 6.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (120W vs 295W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (120W vs 295W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7900. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7900 currently gives you 4.3% higher G3D Mark and 6.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	204 FPS	262 FPS
medium	190 FPS	242 FPS
high	163 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	149 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	188 FPS	246 FPS
medium	159 FPS	205 FPS
high	128 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	174 FPS
medium	102 FPS	145 FPS
high	76 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	501 FPS	813 FPS
medium	438 FPS	639 FPS
high	353 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	617 FPS
medium	332 FPS	495 FPS
high	268 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	214 FPS	320 FPS
medium	187 FPS	256 FPS
high	159 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	884 FPS	945 FPS
medium	735 FPS	775 FPS
high	661 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	570 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	697 FPS	714 FPS
medium	577 FPS	587 FPS
high	508 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	474 FPS	498 FPS
medium	396 FPS	412 FPS
high	347 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	282 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	723 FPS	946 FPS
medium	655 FPS	801 FPS
high	573 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	581 FPS	714 FPS
medium	520 FPS	604 FPS
high	456 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	400 FPS	505 FPS
medium	364 FPS	437 FPS
high	334 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 27,048 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 304 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	27,048	28,211+4%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	9728+58%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	32.98 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	2495 MHz+47%
ROPs	112	192+71%
TMUs	304	384+26%
L1 Cache	9.5 MB+217%	3 MB
L2 Cache	64 MB+967%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	76	96+26%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	48 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	576 GB/s	864 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	64 MB+967%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile draws 120W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 84.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	120W-59%	295W
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	3
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	225.4+136%	95.6