G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

2023

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

✅27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 120W instead of 300W, a 180W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌150% higher power demand at 300W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than Radeon AI PRO R9700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 5.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2025, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $1,299 MSRP, and you are getting 27.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (27,048 vs 28,589). Radeon AI PRO R9700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon AI PRO R9700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon AI PRO R9700 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile?

Yes. Radeon AI PRO R9700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $1,299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (27,048 vs 28,589) and 27.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon AI PRO R9700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon AI PRO R9700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
1080p
low	204 FPS	222 FPS
medium	190 FPS	206 FPS
high	163 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	149 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	188 FPS	201 FPS
medium	159 FPS	170 FPS
high	128 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	136 FPS
medium	102 FPS	115 FPS
high	76 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	86 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon AI PRO R9700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
1080p
low	501 FPS	572 FPS
medium	438 FPS	452 FPS
high	353 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	281 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	405 FPS
medium	332 FPS	324 FPS
high	268 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	207 FPS
4K
low	214 FPS	205 FPS
medium	187 FPS	170 FPS
high	159 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	121 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon AI PRO R9700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
1080p
low	884 FPS	911 FPS
medium	735 FPS	755 FPS
high	661 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	570 FPS	574 FPS
1440p
low	697 FPS	701 FPS
medium	577 FPS	576 FPS
high	508 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	421 FPS
4K
low	474 FPS	492 FPS
medium	396 FPS	406 FPS
high	347 FPS	348 FPS
ultra	282 FPS	284 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon AI PRO R9700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
1080p
low	723 FPS	812 FPS
medium	655 FPS	706 FPS
high	573 FPS	636 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	558 FPS
1440p
low	581 FPS	639 FPS
medium	520 FPS	555 FPS
high	456 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	408 FPS	426 FPS
4K
low	400 FPS	424 FPS
medium	364 FPS	376 FPS
high	334 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	297 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile Open Radeon AI PRO R9700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 27,048 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 5.7%. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 304 Tensor cores vs 128.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
G3D Mark Score	27,048	28,589+6%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	4 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	9728+138%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	32.98 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1695 MHz	2920 MHz+72%
ROPs	112	128+14%
TMUs	304+19%	256
L2 Cache	64 MB+700%	8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	76+19%	64
Tensor Cores	304+138%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	64 MB+700%	8 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 5.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 5.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile draws 120W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile	Radeon AI PRO R9700
TDP	120W-60%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	225.4+137%	95.3