
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅65.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 184).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅11.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅65.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 184).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 884 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 643 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 384 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 296 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile reaches 27,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 184 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919 | 27,048 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 9728+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+46% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 184 | 304+65% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 9.5 MB+64% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 64 MB+78% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 76+65% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 304+65% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB | 64 MB+78% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 50% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6 | 225.4+67% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












