
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅5.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 304).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
2021GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅5.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 304).
Why buy it
- ✅10.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 903 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 348 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 763 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 532 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 296 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,861 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti scores 26,861 and the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile reaches 27,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,240 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 34.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 320 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,861 | 27,048 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10240+5% | 9728 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 34.1 TFLOPS+3% | 32.98 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 112 | 112 |
| TMUs | 320+5% | 304 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+5% | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 64 MB+967% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+5% | 76 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+5% | 304 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 912 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 58.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 912 GB/s+58% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 64 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti draws 350W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 97.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 120W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7 | 225.4+194% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | AD103 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #33 | #30 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












