
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is T1000 8GB better than Radeon RX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 780 make more sense than T1000 8GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and T1000 8GB

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

T1000 8GB
T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,674 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+1335% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+67% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 113% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 153.5+261% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500. The Radeon RX 780 costs 0.2% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 15.3 (T1000 8GB) — the T1000 8GB offers 0% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 15.3 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | TU117 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #131 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












