
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅118.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 780
2024Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅118.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 780 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 780 better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 345 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Radeon RX 6500

Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,610 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 172mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 101.5+139% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 60.1% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 149.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 38.2+150% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | — |
| Release | September 11 2024 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #131 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












